What compiler options cannot be specified with the >> IMP OPTION compiler directive? |
The compiler options will have no effect when they are specified in the source file with the >> IMP OPTION directive:
-exec, -la, -lf, -lfo, -lo, -od, sf, -st, -sa, -sl, -sv, -smat and -zmf
For example, the following syntax will NOT move the compiled class to the prg folder:
>> IMP OPTION "-od=prg"
Instead of using the >> IMP OPTION syntax for these unsupported options, add the option to the command line, or list them in your properties file with iscobol.compiler.options.
For example:
iscc -od=prg myprog.cbl
or
iscobol.compiler.options=-od=prg
|
Authored
by: Veryant Support
This question has been viewed 7499 times so far.
|
Click
Here to View all the questions in Compiler General
category. |
File Attachments |
There are no attachment file(s) related to this question. |
|
User Comments |
|
|
There are no user comments for this question. Be the first to post a comment. Click Here |
Related Questions
|
- Why do I get the error "java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/sun/tools/javac/Main" ?
- How do I resolve "Error writing file: too many constants" error?
- Is there a faster way to compile?
- How can I make my Linkage parameters more flexible?
- How do I retrieve the version of the Java Compiler and the isCOBOL Compiler that produced a given class file?
- Using Regular Expressions to replace text in your program
- Is there a compiler option in isCOBOL to extend the length of AREA B in a program source code?
- This is a test
|